Yesterday afternoon saw the publication of England’s long awaited land use framework (LUF) The Land Use Framework for England. In this joint piece our programme policy lead Jess Fìor-Berry and the Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts agricultural strategic lead Vicki Hird reflect on how England’s peatlands were represented and how it supports their conservation.
The framework is an important step forward towards reaching our international agreements around biodiversity and net zero objectives. However overall, the LUF seems big on ambition but low on cast iron detail. At the outset it is stated that is not designed to be binding, but the embedding of the LUF into schemes such as SFI and LR would seem to make sense. There is also a welcome acknowledgement of the need to deal with problems in a cross-cutting manner rather than a siloed fashion. However, it would be helpful to have greater detail on how the government plans to make this a reality given the huge range of departments and arm’s length bodies with diverse remits.
There is significant reference to the importance of peatlands with twenty-four mentions throughout the document, with discussion around lowland and upland peatlands. We look at what the LUF had to say:
The key headlines for peatlands
- Crucial recognition of the role of the UK’s peatlands in contributing to water security, reducing flood risk and storing carbon.
- In the table on the need for change to extent of land managed for different purposes “Restoration and maintenance of peat forming and peat-dependent habitats” is discussed, which suggests that greater consideration will be given to the wider mosaic. We welcome this recognition of the interconnectedness of habitats and would urge the government to publish more on their thinking around how this will work in practice.
- There will be new guidance for internal drainage boards (IDBs) the management of which we highlighted in our LUF consultation response. However, a timeline for this is not provided and it does not appear that the government plans to bring these under greater regulatory control.
- There is a commitment to provide £50 million in funding over the next four years to support wetter farming systems and more sustainable management of lowland peatlands. It is concerning that there are not figures attached to upland peatlands however, something we have expressed concerns over governments seeing the uplands as having been ‘fixed’.
- The pledge to ‘explore land purchase opportunities’ in order to increase peatland restoration is interesting, but there is not sufficient detail in the framework to understand how this could work and whether this would result in the creation of national nature reserves. This would also require significant funding but there is no monetary guidance given in the LUF.
- There was a disappointing absence of commitments around side drivers of demand including peat compost, feeds and agrofuels, which place pressure through extraction and drainage demands.
Vicki attended the in-person launch event and had the following thoughts: